Mystification :: essays research papers

MystificationIn Bergers essay, he uses the term obfuscation. Mystification is bingle way to set out describing the ways in which people perceive what they see. When people look at same moving- belief show or advertisement, they perceive and interpret differently. As John Berger says, we ar ever so looking at the relation between things and ourselves (156). We see things differently from one another and in the beginning we see things, but without language and understanding, we cannot let off what it is we see. The way we see things is predetermined by different factors such as our own experiences and status. Berger provides an example two paintings by Frans Hals. The two paintings are picture of a group of governors and a group of governesses. The paintings imply that how our societyhas accent an upper class at the period. And, high status people comptroller the peoples view. As Berger says, the art of the past is being amaze because a privileged minority is striving to inve nt a memoir which can retrospectively justify the office of the ruling classes, and such a justification can no longer make sense in modern terms (157). The upper class mystifies us to stay in control without being able to see things in our own way, we are being deprived from our right to understanding ourselves and placing ourselves in a role of society. The privileged minority mystifies works of art in order to control peoples view. Berger explains how Hals becomes after he painted the two paintings. harmonise to Berger, he obtained three loads of peat on public liberality, otherwise he would have frozen to death. Those who now sat for him were administrators of such public charity (158).